From 903117025dc23f39c6017616da7d25ef2f2d6411 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Delaigue Olivier <olivier.delaigue@irstea.fr>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 16:32:50 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] docs(man): review text in 'CreateCalibOptions' help page
---
man/CreateCalibOptions.Rd | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/man/CreateCalibOptions.Rd b/man/CreateCalibOptions.Rd
index 9162660..c15e00a 100644
--- a/man/CreateCalibOptions.Rd
+++ b/man/CreateCalibOptions.Rd
@@ -86,6 +86,8 @@ the package must create their own \code{CalibOptions} object accordingly. \cr
If \code{IsHyst = FALSE}, the original CemaNeige version from Valéry et al. (2014) is used. \cr
If \code{IsHyst = TRUE}, the CemaNeige version from Riboust et al. (2019) is used. Compared to the original version, this version of CemaNeige needs two more parameters and it includes a representation of the hysteretic relationship between the Snow Cover Area (SCA) and the Snow Water Equivalent (SWE) in the catchment. The hysteresis included in airGR is the Modified Linear hysteresis (LH*); it is represented on panel b) of Fig. 3 in Riboust et al. (2019). Riboust et al. (2019) advise to use the LH* version of CemaNeige with parameters calibrated using an objective function combining 75 \% of KGE calculated on discharge simulated from a rainfall-runoff model compared to observed discharge and 5 \% of KGE calculated on SCA on 5 CemaNeige elevation bands compared to satellite (e.g. MODIS) SCA (see Eq. (18), Table 3 and Fig. 6). Riboust et al. (2019)'s tests were realized with GR4J as the chosen rainfall-runoff model. \cr
+## --- Semi-distributed mode
+
If \code{InputsModel} parameter has been created for using a semi-distributed (SD) model (See \code{\link{CreateInputsModel}}), the parameter \code{IsSD} should be set to \code{TRUE}.
}
--
GitLab