Commit 9cbefd78 authored by Delaigue Olivier's avatar Delaigue Olivier
Browse files

docs(vignette): format text in the 'sd_model' vignette

parent 156a20c1
Pipeline #26031 failed with stages
in 12 minutes and 38 seconds
......@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ As a priori parameter set, we use the calibrated parameter set of the upstream c
ParamDownTheo <- c(Velocity, OutputsCalibUp$ParamFinalR)
```
The De Lavenne criterion is initialised with the a priori parameter set and the value of the KGE of the upstream basin.
The Lavenne criterion is initialised with the a priori parameter set and the value of the KGE of the upstream basin.
```{r}
IC_Lavenne <- CreateInputsCrit_Lavenne(InputsModel = InputsModelDown2,
......@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ IC_Lavenne <- CreateInputsCrit_Lavenne(InputsModel = InputsModelDown2,
AprCrit = OutputsCalibUp$CritFinal)
```
The De Lavenne criterion is used instead of the KGE for calibration with regularisation
The Lavenne criterion is used instead of the KGE for calibration with regularisation
```{r}
OutputsCalibDown3 <- Calibration_Michel(InputsModel = InputsModelDown2,
......@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ knitr::kable(mVelocity)
## Value of the performance criteria with theoretical calibration
Theoretically, the parameters of the downstream GR4J model should be the same as the upstream one with the velocity as extra parameter :
Theoretically, the parameters of the downstream GR4J model should be the same as the upstream one with the velocity as extra parameter:
```{r}
OutputsModelDownTheo <- RunModel(InputsModel = InputsModelDown2,
......
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment