airGR issueshttps://gitlab.irstea.fr/HYCAR-Hydro/airgr/-/issues2022-09-13T14:58:36+02:00https://gitlab.irstea.fr/HYCAR-Hydro/airgr/-/issues/166Update GR5H interception grid-screening parameter quantiles2022-09-13T14:58:36+02:00Delaigue OlivierUpdate GR5H interception grid-screening parameter quantilesAccording to the tests made by @cyril.thebault on the ~579 catchments, it seems to be needed to update the GR5H interception parameter quantiles used during the grid-screening calibration step.
Current values:
```r
GR5Hinterception = ...According to the tests made by @cyril.thebault on the ~579 catchments, it seems to be needed to update the GR5H interception parameter quantiles used during the grid-screening calibration step.
Current values:
```r
GR5Hinterception = matrix(c(+3.46, -1.25, +4.04, -9.53, -9.34,
+3.74, -0.41, +4.78, -8.94, -3.33,
+4.29, +0.16, +5.39, -7.39, +3.33), ncol = 5, byrow = TRUE)
```
New values (found after 4 convergence loops):
```r
GR5Hinterception = matrix(c(+4.92, -0.17, +4.27, -9.81, -9.29,
+5.42, -0.07, +4.94, -9.66, -7.36,
+6.05, -0.01, +5.63, -9.26, -5.55), ncol = 5, byrow = TRUE)
```v1.8https://gitlab.irstea.fr/HYCAR-Hydro/airgr/-/issues/161RunModel_Lag: proposal for a better transformation and screening of the param...2023-02-02T14:04:02+01:00Dorchies DavidRunModel_Lag: proposal for a better transformation and screening of the parametersThe work of Enola Henrotin highlights some issues with the calibration of the lag model. These issues are essentially due to an inadequate transformation of the celerity parameter.
The document below summarizes these issues and proposes...The work of Enola Henrotin highlights some issues with the calibration of the lag model. These issues are essentially due to an inadequate transformation of the celerity parameter.
The document below summarizes these issues and proposes a new transformation and a set of screening values from experimental measurements of flow velocities in a various rivers:
[Sensibility-of-celerity-parameter-on-Lag-model.html](/uploads/ea137265ad43a30113926721c4497ca1/Sensibility-of-celerity-parameter-on-Lag-model.html)
The proposed formulas are (respectively for the transformed and the real parameter):
```math
C_{T} = \dfrac{120}{299C_{0}} - \dfrac{3010}{299} \\
C_0 = \dfrac{120}{299 (C_T + 3010 / 299)}
```
The proposed screening values of transformed parameter are: -9.7; -8.7; -2.0
Sources of the document:
- [Sensibility_of_celerity_parameter_on_Lag_model.Rmd](/uploads/504b8cafa8763657fa1ee9036dbd9349/Sensibility_of_celerity_parameter_on_Lag_model.Rmd)
- [celerity_sensibility.bib](/uploads/484d9de749caec8781c72fb71ee774a1/celerity_sensibility.bib)v1.8https://gitlab.irstea.fr/HYCAR-Hydro/airgr/-/issues/155Add the names of the parameter in Calibration2022-07-18T17:39:08+02:00Dorchies DavidAdd the names of the parameter in CalibrationAdd a names to the final parameters with the complete name of the parametersAdd a names to the final parameters with the complete name of the parametersv1.8https://gitlab.irstea.fr/HYCAR-Hydro/airgr/-/issues/153SD: Add Linear Lag and Route propagation model2022-09-12T08:42:45+02:00Dorchies DavidSD: Add Linear Lag and Route propagation modelProcessed by Enola Henrotin.
See the forked project on https://gitlab.irstea.fr/david.dorchies/airgrProcessed by Enola Henrotin.
See the forked project on https://gitlab.irstea.fr/david.dorchies/airgrDorchies DavidDorchies Davidhttps://gitlab.irstea.fr/HYCAR-Hydro/airgr/-/issues/152SD: Add capability to integrate other propagation models2022-08-02T15:46:53+02:00Dorchies DavidSD: Add capability to integrate other propagation modelsAs for `FUN_MOD` for choosing the GR model, add a `FUN_SD` parameter to allow the user to choose the propagation model in SD models.
This work is processed by Enola Henrotin on the fork https://gitlab.irstea.fr/david.dorchies/airgrAs for `FUN_MOD` for choosing the GR model, add a `FUN_SD` parameter to allow the user to choose the propagation model in SD models.
This work is processed by Enola Henrotin on the fork https://gitlab.irstea.fr/david.dorchies/airgrDorchies DavidDorchies Davidhttps://gitlab.irstea.fr/HYCAR-Hydro/airgr/-/issues/150Implemente Daniela Peredo's work2022-07-19T08:50:53+02:00Thirel GuillaumeImplemente Daniela Peredo's workThat could be useful to add Daniela's work in airGR (see https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02626667.2022.2030864).
Maybe @paul.astagneau you have already implented it by the way?That could be useful to add Daniela's work in airGR (see https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02626667.2022.2030864).
Maybe @paul.astagneau you have already implented it by the way?https://gitlab.irstea.fr/HYCAR-Hydro/airgr/-/issues/143SeriesAggreg: allow to define a unique aggregation function for multiple columns2021-12-16T08:22:17+01:00Dorchies DavidSeriesAggreg: allow to define a unique aggregation function for multiple columns`SeriesAggreg` is very useful for calculating annual or monthly indicators.
For example, I use it to calculate annual hydrologic indicator on data.frame containing the simulated flow for plenty of gauging stations.
For doing that, I ha...`SeriesAggreg` is very useful for calculating annual or monthly indicators.
For example, I use it to calculate annual hydrologic indicator on data.frame containing the simulated flow for plenty of gauging stations.
For doing that, I have to write:
```r
SeriesAggreg(dfQ, Format = "%Y", ConvertFun = rep("calcMyIndicator", ncol(dfQ) - 1))
```
Could we assume that if a unique function is provided by the user for `ConvertFun` therefore it is implicitly applied for all columns?
This syntax would be largely more convenient:
```r
SeriesAggreg(dfQ, Format = "%Y", ConvertFun = "calcMyIndicator")
```https://gitlab.irstea.fr/HYCAR-Hydro/airgr/-/issues/140Adjust TransfoParam_GR5H (X2)2022-01-21T17:00:38+01:00Astagneau PaulAdjust TransfoParam_GR5H (X2)There might be an issue with the transformation of X2 in GR5H.
The transformation of X2 (from T to R) in `TransfoParam_GR5J` and `TransfoParam_GR5H` is:
`ParamOut[, 2] <- sinh(ParamIn[, 2])`
For both models, the calculation of potentia...There might be an issue with the transformation of X2 in GR5H.
The transformation of X2 (from T to R) in `TransfoParam_GR5J` and `TransfoParam_GR5H` is:
`ParamOut[, 2] <- sinh(ParamIn[, 2])`
For both models, the calculation of potential intercatchment semi-exchange is:
`EXCH=Param(2)*(St(2)/Param(3)-Param(5))`
X2 is in mm/timestep, which means that X2 is timestep dependant.
The calculation of hourly potential intercatchment semi-exchange is calculated differently by [Le Moine, 2008, p. 173](https://webgr.inrae.fr/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/2008-LE_MOINE-THESE.pdf).
The distribution of X2 over 229 catchments changes when dividing X2 by 24 in the fortran code. ![X2change_distrib_2021-12-07](/uploads/207f5b4cef5917388fa6a41c28371b40/X2change_distrib_2021-12-07.png)
Most X2 values were equal to -0.04 mm/h, which is one of the prefiltering values.https://gitlab.irstea.fr/HYCAR-Hydro/airgr/-/issues/135Regularisation: handle composite criterion2021-11-03T14:22:18+01:00Dorchies DavidRegularisation: handle composite criterionTest and implement the possibility to use composite criteria (e.g.: KGE(sqrt(Q)) mixed with KGE(1/Q)) with Lavenne regularisation.Test and implement the possibility to use composite criteria (e.g.: KGE(sqrt(Q)) mixed with KGE(1/Q)) with Lavenne regularisation.v1.8Dorchies DavidDorchies Davidhttps://gitlab.irstea.fr/HYCAR-Hydro/airgr/-/issues/118plot.OutputsModel: remove case sensitivity to the `which` argument2021-04-26T14:35:21+02:00Dorchies Davidplot.OutputsModel: remove case sensitivity to the `which` argumentIs it possible to have the `which` argument case insensitive?:
```r
> plot(OMinf2nat$CHALO_21, Qinf[I_Run, "CHALO_21"], which = "regime")
Error in plot.OutputsModel(OMinf2nat$CHALO_21, Qinf[I_Run, "CHALO_21"], :
incorrect element fo...Is it possible to have the `which` argument case insensitive?:
```r
> plot(OMinf2nat$CHALO_21, Qinf[I_Run, "CHALO_21"], which = "regime")
Error in plot.OutputsModel(OMinf2nat$CHALO_21, Qinf[I_Run, "CHALO_21"], :
incorrect element found in argument 'which': "regime"
it can only contain "all", "synth", "ts", "perf", "Precip", "PotEvap", "ActuEvap", "Temp", "SnowPack", "Flows", "Error", "Regime", "CumFreq", "CorQQ"
> plot(OMinf2nat$CHALO_21, Qinf[I_Run, "CHALO_21"], which = "Regime")
```https://gitlab.irstea.fr/HYCAR-Hydro/airgr/-/issues/117Check the compatibility between the RunOptions and the InputsModel obects2021-11-03T14:24:36+01:00Dorchies DavidCheck the compatibility between the RunOptions and the InputsModel obectsHere the necessary data: [GR4J_crash.RData](/uploads/8f44ff6a10af128a396c78110b9a7e6e/GR4J_crash.RData)
And the code tested on the last `dev` version:
```r
> library(airGR)
> load("GR4J_crash.RData")
> ls()
[1] "InputsModel" "Param" ...Here the necessary data: [GR4J_crash.RData](/uploads/8f44ff6a10af128a396c78110b9a7e6e/GR4J_crash.RData)
And the code tested on the last `dev` version:
```r
> library(airGR)
> load("GR4J_crash.RData")
> ls()
[1] "InputsModel" "Param" "RunOptions"
> Param
[1] 169.017118 -2.375568 20.697233 1.417417
> RunModel_GR4J(InputsModel, RunOptions, Param)
Error in RunModel_GR4J(InputsModel, RunOptions, Param) :
NA/NaN/Inf in foreign function call (arg 2)
```
The error occurs in the Fortran call. I don't know how to debug that...v1.8Delaigue OlivierDelaigue Olivierhttps://gitlab.irstea.fr/HYCAR-Hydro/airgr/-/issues/97Parallelize CemaNeige2021-03-02T09:59:34+01:00Thirel GuillaumeParallelize CemaNeigeSimilarly to https://gitlab.irstea.fr/HYCAR-Hydro/airgr/-/issues/96, the computation done on several altitude bands of CemaNeige could be parallelized. This remark is potentially valid both for `RunModel_CemaNeige*` calculation but also ...Similarly to https://gitlab.irstea.fr/HYCAR-Hydro/airgr/-/issues/96, the computation done on several altitude bands of CemaNeige could be parallelized. This remark is potentially valid both for `RunModel_CemaNeige*` calculation but also for `DataAltiExtrapolation_Valery`.https://gitlab.irstea.fr/HYCAR-Hydro/airgr/-/issues/96Parallelize the grid-screening step during calibration2021-11-03T14:13:16+01:00Delaigue OlivierParallelize the grid-screening step during calibrationIt is possible to parallelize the grid-screening step during calibration, this would speed up the calibration when the model used has many parameters, especially for some 'airGRplus' models.
We can use the 'parallel' package in order no...It is possible to parallelize the grid-screening step during calibration, this would speed up the calibration when the model used has many parameters, especially for some 'airGRplus' models.
We can use the 'parallel' package in order not to depend to an external package, because this one is automatically installed with R.v1.8https://gitlab.irstea.fr/HYCAR-Hydro/airgr/-/issues/84Add the use of '['.OutputsModel in plot.OutputsModel2021-07-14T10:14:45+02:00Delaigue OlivierAdd the use of '['.OutputsModel in plot.OutputsModelIt could be nice to simplify the code of the `plot.OutputsModel()` function by the use of '['.OutputsModel in order to manage the `IndPeriod_Plot` argument.It could be nice to simplify the code of the `plot.OutputsModel()` function by the use of '['.OutputsModel in order to manage the `IndPeriod_Plot` argument.v2.0https://gitlab.irstea.fr/HYCAR-Hydro/airgr/-/issues/60Migrate TransfoParam functions and CreateCalibOptions to S3 methods2021-06-03T11:50:21+02:00Dorchies DavidMigrate TransfoParam functions and CreateCalibOptions to S3 methodsThe main idea is to facilitate the model chaining (e.g. CemaNeige + GR4J + LAG) in order to reduce the current code complexity and facilitate extension to new models in the future. S3 class concepts are a good candidate to tackle this i...The main idea is to facilitate the model chaining (e.g. CemaNeige + GR4J + LAG) in order to reduce the current code complexity and facilitate extension to new models in the future. S3 class concepts are a good candidate to tackle this issue. A Proof of Concept written in Rmarkdown showing how model chaining can be operated is available here :
[PoC_airGR_S3_classes.Rmd](/uploads/4492a10c93c3c7ba4547c76bf6f19896/PoC_airGR_S3_classes.Rmd)
## Starting point
Currently in `master` and `dev` branches, depending on the `FUN_MOD` provided to `CreateCalibOptions` a serie of conditions assign a `FUN1` variable corresponding to a `TransfoParam_GR*` function and a `FUN2` variable corresponding to either `TransfoParam_CemaNeige` or `TransfoParam_CemaNeigeHyst` depending on `isHyst` parameter. If several models are involved (e.g. CemaNeige + GR4J), then a "meta" FUN_TRANSFO function is written, binding columns of the output matrix with outputs of each model. In the `SD` branch the complexity of the process is again complicated by adding parameters of the LAG model.
## Proposition
- Modify CreateCalibOption in order to assign classes corresponding to the models involved in the model chain to the and call a generic function `TransfoParam`
- Change the name of `transfoParam_*` function to `TransfoParam.*` methods
- Rewrite `TransfoParam` generic function in order to automatically bind columns of the matrix `ParamT`
## Pitfalls
If we assume a generic form of the model chaining and put in correspondence the order of the model with the order of the parameters, the current order in `SD` implementation is not compliant: the current order is : `param = c(GRparam, CemaneigeParam, LAGparam)`. If we considere `Cemaneige` as a pretreatment of the rain, before running a `GR` model and `LAG` a routing model applied after GR model, this order of parameter is not logical.
To solve this issue, as the order of parameter between `GR` and `Cemaneige` is already fixed on older versions and SD model is not public yet, I propose to adopt this order of parameters: `param = c(LAGparam, GRparam, CemaneigeParam)`.v2.0Dorchies DavidDorchies Davidhttps://gitlab.irstea.fr/HYCAR-Hydro/airgr/-/issues/54Add a dam module with the lumped GR models2021-04-27T08:11:42+02:00Thirel GuillaumeAdd a dam module with the lumped GR modelsFollowing the PhD thesis of Jean-Luc Payan and the work of Morgane Terrier, we have pieces of `airGR `codes that allow to take into account the impact of dams in the GR4J and GR5J models. Knowing a time series of delta V, i.e. the variat...Following the PhD thesis of Jean-Luc Payan and the work of Morgane Terrier, we have pieces of `airGR `codes that allow to take into account the impact of dams in the GR4J and GR5J models. Knowing a time series of delta V, i.e. the variation of the volume of water in a dam, it is possible to subtract water from the production store and to release in the the routing store.
Not sure about GR6J, Morgane told me it caused issues with the exponential store, to be checked with @charles.perrin .
Eventual inclusion of this module in `airGR `should be thought of considering parallel works on semi-distribution.
Also important will be how to deal with this additional input data (observed delta V time series).https://gitlab.irstea.fr/HYCAR-Hydro/airgr/-/issues/48Improve computation time of the Imax function2021-04-19T08:20:53+02:00Delaigue OlivierImprove computation time of the Imax functionComputation time of the `Imax()` function needs to be improved.The use of the double loop slows down the code strongly.Computation time of the `Imax()` function needs to be improved.The use of the double loop slows down the code strongly.https://gitlab.irstea.fr/HYCAR-Hydro/airgr/-/issues/42Add new function to manage time steps2021-04-19T09:09:56+02:00Delaigue OlivierAdd new function to manage time stepsIt is maybe a good idea to create an internal function to manage the time steps in order to avoid command lines in many functions:
```
if ("daily" %in% class(XXXXXXX)) {
TimeStep <- 60 * 60 * 24
}
if ("hourly" %in% class(XXXXXXX)) {
...It is maybe a good idea to create an internal function to manage the time steps in order to avoid command lines in many functions:
```
if ("daily" %in% class(XXXXXXX)) {
TimeStep <- 60 * 60 * 24
}
if ("hourly" %in% class(XXXXXXX)) {
TimeStep <- 60 * 60
}
```https://gitlab.irstea.fr/HYCAR-Hydro/airgr/-/issues/40Set time series of altitudes in CemaNeige2020-03-29T04:59:35+02:00Delaigue OlivierSet time series of altitudes in CemaNeigeIn the `DataAltiExtrapolation_Valery()` function, it would be desirable to be able to provide a time series of altitudes because :
- the geographical position of the meteorological station may change over time
- time series of meteorolog...In the `DataAltiExtrapolation_Valery()` function, it would be desirable to be able to provide a time series of altitudes because :
- the geographical position of the meteorological station may change over time
- time series of meteorological data can be computed from the interpolation of several stations, the number of which varies over timehttps://gitlab.irstea.fr/HYCAR-Hydro/airgr/-/issues/39Allow different altitudes for meteorological variables in CemaNeige2020-11-24T09:01:51+01:00Delaigue OlivierAllow different altitudes for meteorological variables in CemaNeigeIn the `DataAltiExtrapolation_Valery` function, it would be preferable to be able to set the average elevation of the precipitation and temperature series in two separate variables. Measurements are not always taken at the same geographi...In the `DataAltiExtrapolation_Valery` function, it would be preferable to be able to set the average elevation of the precipitation and temperature series in two separate variables. Measurements are not always taken at the same geographical position, and therefore at different altitudes.