From 9cbefd784eae2a36b3bb8fc156f8b184874e04e2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Delaigue Olivier <olivier.delaigue@irstea.fr>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2021 13:26:18 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] docs(vignette): format text in the 'sd_model' vignette
---
vignettes/V05_sd_model.Rmd | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/vignettes/V05_sd_model.Rmd b/vignettes/V05_sd_model.Rmd
index 333284e8..6c17770e 100644
--- a/vignettes/V05_sd_model.Rmd
+++ b/vignettes/V05_sd_model.Rmd
@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ As a priori parameter set, we use the calibrated parameter set of the upstream c
ParamDownTheo <- c(Velocity, OutputsCalibUp$ParamFinalR)
```
-The De Lavenne criterion is initialised with the a priori parameter set and the value of the KGE of the upstream basin.
+The Lavenne criterion is initialised with the a priori parameter set and the value of the KGE of the upstream basin.
```{r}
IC_Lavenne <- CreateInputsCrit_Lavenne(InputsModel = InputsModelDown2,
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ IC_Lavenne <- CreateInputsCrit_Lavenne(InputsModel = InputsModelDown2,
AprCrit = OutputsCalibUp$CritFinal)
```
-The De Lavenne criterion is used instead of the KGE for calibration with regularisation
+The Lavenne criterion is used instead of the KGE for calibration with regularisation
```{r}
OutputsCalibDown3 <- Calibration_Michel(InputsModel = InputsModelDown2,
@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ knitr::kable(mVelocity)
## Value of the performance criteria with theoretical calibration
-Theoretically, the parameters of the downstream GR4J model should be the same as the upstream one with the velocity as extra parameter :
+Theoretically, the parameters of the downstream GR4J model should be the same as the upstream one with the velocity as extra parameter:
```{r}
OutputsModelDownTheo <- RunModel(InputsModel = InputsModelDown2,
--
GitLab