Commit 39ba7e7e authored by Delaigue Olivier's avatar Delaigue Olivier
Browse files

docs(man): fix typo in 'CreateCalibOptions' pages

No related merge requests found
Pipeline #53960 passed with stage
in 7 minutes and 50 seconds
Showing with 1 addition and 1 deletion
+1 -1
...@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ the package must create their own \code{CalibOptions} object accordingly. \cr ...@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ the package must create their own \code{CalibOptions} object accordingly. \cr
If \code{IsHyst = FALSE}, the original CemaNeige version from Valéry et al. (2014) is used. \cr If \code{IsHyst = FALSE}, the original CemaNeige version from Valéry et al. (2014) is used. \cr
If \code{IsHyst = TRUE}, the CemaNeige version from Riboust et al. (2019) is used. Compared to the original version, this version of CemaNeige needs two more parameters and it includes a representation of the hysteretic relationship between the Snow Cover Area (SCA) and the Snow Water Equivalent (SWE) in the catchment. The hysteresis included in airGR is the Modified Linear hysteresis (LH*); it is represented on panel b) of Fig. 3 in Riboust et al. (2019). Riboust et al. (2019) advise to use the LH* version of CemaNeige with parameters calibrated using an objective function combining 75 \% of KGE calculated on discharge simulated from a rainfall-runoff model compared to observed discharge and 5 \% of KGE calculated on SCA on 5 CemaNeige elevation bands compared to satellite (e.g. MODIS) SCA (see Eq. (18), Table 3 and Fig. 6). Riboust et al. (2019)'s tests were realized with GR4J as the chosen rainfall-runoff model. \cr If \code{IsHyst = TRUE}, the CemaNeige version from Riboust et al. (2019) is used. Compared to the original version, this version of CemaNeige needs two more parameters and it includes a representation of the hysteretic relationship between the Snow Cover Area (SCA) and the Snow Water Equivalent (SWE) in the catchment. The hysteresis included in airGR is the Modified Linear hysteresis (LH*); it is represented on panel b) of Fig. 3 in Riboust et al. (2019). Riboust et al. (2019) advise to use the LH* version of CemaNeige with parameters calibrated using an objective function combining 75 \% of KGE calculated on discharge simulated from a rainfall-runoff model compared to observed discharge and 5 \% of KGE calculated on SCA on 5 CemaNeige elevation bands compared to satellite (e.g. MODIS) SCA (see Eq. (18), Table 3 and Fig. 6). Riboust et al. (2019)'s tests were realized with GR4J as the chosen rainfall-runoff model. \cr
If \code{InputsModel} parameter has been created for using a semi-distributed (SD) model (See \code{\link{CreateInputsModel}}), the parameter \code{isSD} should be set to \code{TRUE}. If \code{InputsModel} parameter has been created for using a semi-distributed (SD) model (See \code{\link{CreateInputsModel}}), the parameter \code{IsSD} should be set to \code{TRUE}.
} }
......
Supports Markdown
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment