Using wrong precipitation inputs when calling GR5H in CemaNeigeGR5H ?

I was trying to understand why CemaNeigeGR5H was not as good as CemaNeigeGR4H on my case study and I found a difference in the two calls for .Fortran functions (frun_gr4h and frun_gr5h):

In CemaNeigeGR4H: InputsPrecip = CatchMeltAndPliq

In CemaNeigeGR5H: InputsPrecip = InputsModel$Precip[IndPeriod1]

Does it mean that the snow melt is not taken into account in CemaNeigeGR5H ?

CemaNeigeGR5J looks fine.