Notice that the $\mu_D$ and $\sigma_D$ depend on the basins list considered. The true values for $\mu_D$ and $\sigma_D$ are respectively `r meanInterDistance` and `r standardDeviationInterDistance`. So there is a problem in the AA application <!--# calculte rhe value for Rougier 2015 --> since the number of basins was increased in comparison with @rougier2015CombinedUseEmpirical.
The dashed blue line corresponds to the mean weight ($w_{j_1}$ =`r round(deathBasinWeight, 4)` that is advised to be used as death basin weight. For a departure basin with a $w_{j_1}$ below this value, the strayers mortality is higher than 50 %. For these departure basins, most destination basins are far from the departure basin, the sum of destination basins weights is low and the death basin is attractive.
*The dashed blue line corresponds to the mean weight (*$w_{j_1}$ *=`r round(deathBasinWeight, 4)` that is advised to be used as death basin weight. For a departure basin with a* $w_{j_1}$ *below this value, the strayers mortality is higher than 50 %. For these departure basins, most destination basins are far from the departure basin, the sum of destination basins weights is low and the death basin is attractive.*
```{r, echo =FALSE, warning = FALSE, include = FALSE, mortalyRateLatitude, fig.cap ="Evolution of mortality rate in the death basin according to departure basin latitude"}
The strayer mortality increases at the edge of the distribution.
The selection of basins impacts the strayers mortality. It is probably safer to considered a constant rate rather a death basin.
The selection of basins impacts the strayers mortality. It is probably safer to considered a constant rate rather a death basin. It ais a priority to improve the coverage of the area by increasing the number of basins considered.
The logit function to compute the basin weights introduces a plateau for the short distance that leads to random destination in the the departure vicinity